Brain matters

Saying that education strengths economic growth sounds good old common sense. But proving and measuring this relation is not immediate and therefore interesting. A reasearch, published last year, does it. Eric Hanushek, Dean T. Jamison, Eliot A. Jamison and Ludger Woessmann estimate that

each additional year of average schooling in a country increased the average 40-year growth rate in GDP by about 0.37 percentage points. That may not seem like much, but consider the fact that since World War II, the world economic growth rate has been around 2 to 3 percent of GDP annually. Lifting it by 0.37 percentage points is a boost to annual growth rates of more than 10 percent of what would otherwise have occurred, a significant amount.

Nonetheless, the research suggests that what really matters for economic growth is the quality of education. In other words it is not enough to send children to school: you have to teach them something. Using test-score performances around the world to measure the cognitive skills of students appears

that countries with higher test scores experienced far higher growth rates. If one country’s test-score performance was 0.5 standard deviations higher than another country during the 1960s (…) the first country’s growth rate was, on average, one full percentage point higher annually over the following 40-year period than the second country’s growth rate. Further, once the impact of higher levels of cognitive skills are taken into account, the significance for economic growth of school attainment, i.e., additional years of schooling, dwindles to nothing. A country benefits from asking its students to remain in school for a longer period of time only if the students are learning something as a consequence.

These results are extremely important especially for the countries of the Bottom Billion. What they are saying is that it is better to invest on the quality of the education (where rate of return is much higher) rather than spending to keep students in schools longer.

Tuesday, 17 March 2009

tweets


Twitter: frbailo

links


blogroll


RSS r-bloggers.com

RSS Simply Statistics

RSS Statistical Modeling, Causal Inference, and Social Science

  • The cleantech job market: Every modeler is supposed to be a great Python programmer.
    This post is by Phil Price, not Andrew. I’ve had a run of luck ever since I left my staff scientist position at Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory to become a freelance consultant doing statistical modeling and forecasting, mostly related to electricity … Continue reading →
  • J. K. Rowling (2) vs. Joan Didion; Arnold advances
    Our most recent competition was close. Ethan goes for Mr. 22 based on the duplication of duplicate names: Well Benny can stretch to a double major – Major General for us, working with the Brit’s Major Andre. But that’s not … Continue reading →
  • Do doctors get too little respect nowadays? Or too much?
    This news article laments that doctors don’t get enough respect: ‘Kind of Awkward’: Doctors Find Themselves on a First-Name Basis . . . Female doctors were more than twice as likely as male doctors to be addressed by their first … Continue reading →