On the Evolution of Thinking

What if we are becoming the very same Artificial Intelligence that we are trying to design? The doubt has has been raised by Nicholas Carr in an article published one year ago on The Atlantic and now published on Le Monde. The theory is intriguing and the discourse goes, in the words of developmental psychologist Maryanne Wolf, more or less in this direction:

We are not only what we read, We are how we read.

So, learning directly from the voice of Socrates is not the same as learning from the Internet. The way we approach new ideas and knowledge influences how we assimilate them and how we develop our thinking. The risk is that our mind might find so attractive the effectivness of the Google’s algorithm to try to replicate it forgetting all the ambiguity that has made us what we are. What we are so far.

Update: Have a look at this article on Le Monde about the influence of the new information technologies on culture.

Friday, 5 June 2009

tweets


Twitter: frbailo

links


blogroll


RSS r-bloggers.com

  • Angela Bassa discusses managing data science teams and much more.
    Hugo Bowne-Anderson, the host of DataFramed, the DataCamp podcast, recently interviewed Angela Bassa, the Director of Data Science at iRobot. Here is the podcast link. Introducing Angela Bassa Hugo: Hi there Angela, and welcome to DataFramed. Angela: Thanks, thanks for having me. Hugo: It's a great pleasure to have you on the show, and I'm […]
  • Preview my new book: Introduction to Reproducible Science in R
    I’m pleased to share Part I of my new book “Introduction to Reproducible Science in R“. The purpose of this …Continue reading →
  • How to de-Bias Standard Deviation Estimates
    This note is about attempting to remove the bias brought in by using sample standard deviation estimates to estimate an unknown true standard deviation of a population. We establish there is a bias, concentrate on why it is not important to remove it for reasonable sized samples, and (despite that) give a very complete bias […]
  • Data Science With R Course Series – Week 9
    There are only two more weeks in the course! This week will extend what you learned from the Expected Value by performing an optimization and sensitivity analysis. The optimization and sensitivity analysis will teach you how to identify the maximum bu...
  • RATest. A Randomization Tests package is available on CRAN
    This blog post introduces the RATest package we released a while back on CRAN with my colleague and good friend Mauricio Olivares-Gonzalez. The package contains a collection of randomization tests, data sets and examples. The current version focuses on two testing problems and their implementation in empirical work, mostly related to economics. First, it facilitates […]

RSS Simply Statistics

  • The role of academia in data science education
    I was recently asked to moderate an academic panel on the role of universities in training the data science workforce. I preceded each question with opinionated introductions which I have fused into this blog post. These are weakly held opinions so please consider commenting if you disagree with anything. To discuss data science education we […]
  • Guest Post: Galin Jones on criteria for promotion and tenture in (bio)statistics departments
    Editor’s Note: I attended an ASA Chair’s meeting and spoke about ways we could support junior faculty in data science. After giving my talk Galin Jones, Professor and Director of Statistics at University of Minnesota, and I had an interesting conversation about how they had changed their promotion criteria in response to a faculty candidate […]
  • The economic consequences of MOOCs
    tl;dr check out our new paper on the relationship between MOOC completion and economic outcomes! Last Monday we launched our Chromebook Data Science Program so that anyone with an internet connection, a web browser, and the ability to read and follow instructions could become a data scientist. Why did we launch another MOOC program? Aren’t […]

RSS Statistical Modeling, Causal Inference, and Social Science